PDA

View Full Version : Bisexuality does NOT exist., I gotta set this shit straight yo....


newarkhiphop
May 31st, 2006, 11:03 PM
LOL WAS READING LITTLE BROTHERS BLOG AND FOUND THIS HAD TO SHARE WIT YALL






Ain't no such thing as being 'bisexual' yo.....

You just a confused gay nigga.

I had this shit on my mind after watching that Real Sex shit on the DVArrah and seeing them porno niggas do 'gay for pay' scenes. These are scenes where 'straight' male actors fuck other men, because the pay is so much better.

Get the fuck outta here with that bullshit yo....y'all niggas is gay.

If it was a woman doing 'gay for pay,' then I could see that, because a woman can fake an orgasm. So in a way, she's 'acting.'

But if I see a nigga on tape get rock hard, fuck Peter North in the ass and then shoot all over his chest and shit......dude.....I don't care if you pull a threesome with Cherokee and Obsession in the next scene....you're NOT bisexual........you're fucking gay.

We need to kill the myth of bisexuality yo....

I mean, to me, there are some lines in life that once you cross, they take precedence over everything else.

For instance, most niggas know me as an MC. But if I start smoking crack, am I still an emcee?

FUCK NO!

I'm a crackhead that raps from time to time.

Same principle applies with homosexuality. Once you cross the line of sexing the same sex....your ass is gay first and foremost, no matter how many broads or niggas you do after that.

And I'm not anti-homosexuality......I'm just not with all the 'normalizing' of that shit that goes on today.

I guess that's why I'm kinda against gay marriage....not because I think gay people are 'evil' or 'hellbound' like them church folk (frankly, I think mosta them Jesus freak niggas is bonkers....), but because in a sense it 'normalizes' what is clearly ABnormal behavior. I mean, alot of the arguments that people try to make for homosexuality, you could also make for beastiality or pedophilia.

I think gay people have the right to do whatever they wanna.....but call a spade a muhfuckin spade: that shit ain't natural.

Man was made for Woman, and Woman was made for Man. And if you wanna go against that, hey.....whatever floats your boat....do you.

But don't try to play both sides of the fence.

And if you DO try to play both sides, you're not a hero, you're not provocative, you're not 'sexually liberated,'......yo ass is just plain ol' gay.

AO82
May 31st, 2006, 11:09 PM
And....Why were you watching!

viciuzurban
May 31st, 2006, 11:15 PM
Bisexuality is one of the more commonly misunderstood of all sexualities, next to transsexuality. Some of the most common misconceptions is that it is a passing phase, whether into homosexuality (being gay) or from that into heterosexuality (being straight). Most often bisexual people are considered confused, and wierd, and many misinformed people are convinced that one can only be gay or straight.

Bisexuality does exist hoswever there will come a time when you choose. most young niccas who are trippin about their sexuality usually marry the opposite sex first and then soon realise they are feeling the fellas. peoples sexuality today are becoming more and more blurred as more and more people experiment and nowadays its very difficult to actually discern who is supposedly bisexual gay or str8 curious. being curious is now apart of the norm. as for gay marriage i feel that it is hell long overdue. we are denying people rights we ourselves take for granted. social statistics suggest that love of a child from a female female or male male relationship is more better than a hetrosexual relationship. rather than just having a one night stand and shit most homosexual couples are marred by social expectations and restrictions. before conceiving a chil whether through ivf or donor sperm there are a myriad of issues both partners have to take into consideration

1. issue of benefits, social security
2. names of birth certificates. one parent b/c of social bureacracy cannot be named b/c she is not considered the mother/guardian. usually the next of kin is the birth mother's mother


i add more later....

havma
May 31st, 2006, 11:16 PM
He is right, any man that fucks another is really gay because there is no justification for fucking another man.

viciuzurban
May 31st, 2006, 11:17 PM
And....Why were you watching!

lmao..........did you get an indecent proposal????

FuCkDaPrEz305
May 31st, 2006, 11:25 PM
^^^^Aww shitt!!!

havma
May 31st, 2006, 11:28 PM
And....Why were you watching! He was pretending two straight guys got there really early.

W1ld Bill
May 31st, 2006, 11:40 PM
I don't know if dudes trying to be funny and i can see how someone might find that funny but that shit is just downright ignorant. I aint tryin to preach or nuthin but its exactly this type of stuff that i was talkin about with just being surround by pure ignorance. I gotta break this shit down piece by piece...

1st off, the first half of the blog is purely aimed at men. He even gives women a pass by saying that lesbian porno scenes are ok because women can fake an orgasm (Double Standard) And just to focus on that note for a quick minute, it is quite possible for a man to fake an orgasm if you really want to get technical about it. Everytime a man ejaculates it does not mean that he's having an orgasm. Therefore a guy can ejaculate and not have an orgasm and just fake it.

Secondly, about crossing lines and having things take prescedent, that is also a byproduct of ignorance. He gives the example that if your an MC who takes drugs your not longer an MC but a druggie who raps from time to time. Thats the ignorance that society possesses at work. People would rather focus more on a person being a damn junkie rather then an MC regardless of whichever happened first.

Its like that joke about the bridgebuilder...if you build 1000 bridges your a bridgebuilder but if you suck 1 dick your not longer a bridgebuilder your a dicksucker. Fuck is that? Ignorance allows people to find the worst in others therefore the bad will always out weigh the good in some respect regardless if they even have anything to do with one another.

Third, he says he's against gay marriage because it normalizes what clearly is abnormal but then goes on to say gay people should "do them" and do what they want which is contradictory. Furthermore, the word normal is one of those bullshit words if you want my honest opinion. "Normal" is only defined by how many people do it or how common it is. So from my own personal logic, there is no "normal." Just because its common or that’s what most people do doesn’t mean that that’s what I should be doing too. So therefore because its “normal” for men and woman to be sexual it shouldn’t be looked down upon just because same sex relationships don’t follow the same pattern. Different strokes for different folks. What may be right for you may not be right for some.

The more things change the more they continue to stay the same. People are too close minded and uncompromising to change to battle the everlasting ignorance that society casts upon us.

viciuzurban
May 31st, 2006, 11:45 PM
^PREACH NIGGA!!!

bucbuc99
June 1st, 2006, 02:36 PM
Yo i agree wit u because i be sayin da same thing but y in da hell wus u watching da gay part of real sex

PLAYBOY™
June 1st, 2006, 02:51 PM
it is physically impossible for a man to cum w/o achieving orgasm

cum for a man is the achievement of orgasm

thats what seperates me from women

WOMEN can cum, but it doesnt necessarily mean they had an orgasm

so dudes right...if ur fucking men and nutting on them,ur gay

if ur fucking men and NOT nutting..ur STILL gay

if ur doing ANYTHING sexual with the same sex, ur gay/lesbian

i agree almost completely with dude's blog

some part of it where contradictory though..but hes right for the most part

i dont have a problem either way...ur gay,straight,or otherwise,i dont care

whats ur business is ur business..just dont tell me about it and we'll be fine

W1ld Bill
June 1st, 2006, 05:16 PM
it is physically impossible for a man to cum w/o achieving orgasm

cum for a man is the achievement of orgasm

thats what seperates me from women

WOMEN can cum, but it doesnt necessarily mean they had an orgasm



not true at all. Ejaculation and Orgasm are closely related but they're not synonymous. You can ejaculate and not have an orgasm and you can have an orgasm without ejaculating.

Ejaculation is more about the physical act of cumming. Thats what ejaculation is; cum. However orgasms are more about a feeling of physiological arousal and satisfaction.

Therefore most men usually experience the two simultaneously (the physical satisfaction--Ejaculation--with the physiological satisfaction--Orgasm) however it is more then possible to have one without the other.

http://www.goaskalice.columbia.edu/2935.html



Think about it this way, lets say you were takin against your will for whatever reason and some guy sticks his finger up your ass and stimulates your prostate, your going to cum, almost no doubt about it but would you call that an orgasm (physiological arousal and satisfaction)? Its not like you wanted or enjoyed some dude sticking some fingers up your ass yet you still ejaculated. Therefore you weren't necessarily physiological aroused therefore meaning you can't be physiological satisfied (orgasm) yet you still ejaculated. Meaning the two don't have to necessarily be linked or simultaneous.

papi401
June 1st, 2006, 07:26 PM
i agree 1000% no such thing as bisexual